Moscow’s property market is facing a paradox. Buyer demand is weakening, new-build sales are falling, and investment activity is slowing. Yet developers are not retreating from the land market. On the contrary, their spending on sites is increasing. This does not look like ordinary business expansion. It looks more like an attempt to secure a position for a future that current sales have yet to confirm.
In the first nine months of 2026, around 38,000 shared-equity agreements were registered for new-build homes in Moscow, approximately 36% fewer than a year earlier. That is a substantial decline. Buyers have become more cautious, decisions are taking longer, and the cost of money continues to affect housing affordability.
But fewer transactions do not mean that property has ceased to be in demand. They show that buyers have become more selective and more sensitive to price, payment terms, and the quality of a project. Buyers have not disappeared; they are more likely to postpone a decision, reduce their budget, or choose a different segment.
While sales are cooling, developers are doing the opposite: buying land more actively. From January to September, investment in sites for residential development across Russia reached around RUB 211 billion, up 37% year on year. The number of sites acquired also increased.
Most of this investment went to the Moscow region. The concentration of capital is understandable: liquidity is higher, the market is deeper, and there are more opportunities to deliver large projects. But buying a site does not mean construction will begin immediately, or that future demand for the project is already secured.
A land deal is a bet on several years ahead. A developer may acquire a site now and plan to bring it to market later, when financing conditions change, demand becomes clearer, or the necessary infrastructure is in place. For that reason, rising land investment says more about companies’ strategic expectations than about the market’s current health.
The picture is less optimistic for Moscow property investment. Over the first nine months of the year, investment totalled around RUB 392 billion, down 29% year on year. Even large transactions do not change the overall impression: the market is becoming more cautious, and investors are paying closer attention to the cost of capital, yields, and payback periods.
This is an important difference between the current cycle and a period of active growth. Capital has not disappeared altogether, but it is being allocated more selectively. Some investors are waiting, others are looking for assets with long-term potential, and others will transact only at a meaningful discount or with a clear cash flow.
The completed-home market is showing a different pattern. From January to September, around 101,000 transactions involving completed apartments and homes in commissioned buildings were registered in Moscow, about 3% more than a year earlier. Against the sharp decline in new-build sales, this is a notable divergence.
Completed homes have a clear advantage: buyers can see the actual apartment, assess the building and its surroundings, and in some cases move in sooner. In the primary market, buyers must also consider construction timelines, instalment or mortgage terms, and the risk that their personal financial circumstances may change while they wait.
This does not mean the resale market is winning across the board. Rather, amid uncertainty, some buyers prefer a more tangible outcome, even if that means compromising on a new building or certain layout advantages.
Taken together, these indicators reveal a gap between the present and the future of the market. New-build sales are falling, investment activity in Moscow is weakening, yet land purchases are increasing. Developers continue to build up their project pipelines even though bringing those projects to market at the previous pace has become more difficult.
There is no necessary contradiction here. Land deals and apartment sales operate on different time horizons. A site is acquired with the next market cycle in mind; a home is purchased based on current income, interest rates, and confidence in the future. Land-market activity can therefore remain strong even while end buyers pause.
But this strategy has limits. If demand recovers more slowly than developers expect, land costs and project preparation expenses could become an additional burden. If conditions improve, today’s acquisitions will help companies bring projects to market more quickly. The outcome will depend not on the fact that sites were acquired, but on when and on what terms they can be turned into projects that buyers actually want.
For buyers, the current situation creates more room to compare options and negotiate, but it does not guarantee an automatic fall in prices. It is more important to assess not only the price per square metre, but also the total transaction cost, financing terms, handover dates, and the developer’s financial resilience.
Investors should distinguish between an asset that already generates income and a project whose value depends on future demand. Land may prove to be a strong long-term investment, but only if the entry price, delivery timeline, and market outlook are aligned.
The main signal this week is not simply falling sales or rising land investment taken separately. What matters more is that market participants are looking at different points in time: buyers are cautious today, while developers continue preparing for tomorrow.
The key question now is how close that future really is. If demand begins to recover, today’s land acquisitions will provide a foundation for the next stage of growth. If the pause continues, the market will face a widening gap between developers’ ambitions and buyers’ actual purchasing power.
Our managers will help you make an informed decision and find the right property.
